Solar Vest Certainly Makes A Fashion Statement

solar-vest

By Chris Scott Barr

There are certain things that a person can wear that will instantly earn them the label of “dork” or “nerd.” The pocket protector is a perfect example. Sure, it can be argued that it is a very important accessory for those who carry a multitude of things in their shirt pocket. However, it still looks stupid. The same holds true with this CVFR-S09 Solar Vest.

This vest is equipped with four solar panels which can be used to charge a number of different gadgets. The panels are even removable so that you can set them in the window while you’re inside. The fact that I can hold up to 8 gadgets in my pockets and recharge each of them (one at a time) might seem cool, but it’s not something I’d be caught outside in. For crying out loud it has the words “SOLAR VEST” sewn in the back of it. It might as well say “KICK ME” instead. The $140 price tag doesn’t even justify it as an impulse buy.

[ Chinavision ] VIA [ GeekAlerts ]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Netvouz
  • NewsVine
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • MySpace
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon

Related posts

Intel applies “stars” ratings to processors, processors lose self-esteem

It looks like those confused by the multitude of Intel processors out there needn’t linger in indecision any longer, as Intel itself has now come up with a new scheme that it hopes will help simplify the buying process significantly. As you can see above, that consists of a new rating system that gives processors between one and five stars, which Intel says indicates “relative performance, not a price-performance type of thing.” As you might expect, the five-star rating is reserved for the like of the Core i7 and Core i7 Extreme, with the one-star ranks apparently occupied solely by various Celeron processors — the Atom, it seems, is in a class all its own. Somewhat less notably, Intel has also taken the opportunity to roll out some spruced processor logos, which should already be showing themselves in stores along with displays featuring the new star rating system.

[Thanks, Simon B]


Source

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Netvouz
  • NewsVine
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • MySpace
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon

Related posts

Just A Friendly Reminder

missing

By Evan Ackerman

Hey. Hi there. How’re you doing, good? Good. So, when’s the last time you backed up your computer? I only bring this up because last Friday, someone broke into my apartment and stole my laptop. This, to put it mildly, really sucks for me. But luckily, I had backed up most of my data, which downgraded this whole experience from utterly catastrophic to a serious inconvenience. With this in mind, I would like to spend just a little bit of time suggesting ways in which you can prepare yourself for something happening to your computer which, if you’re anything like me, probably has stuff on it that represents a significant chunk of your life and sanity.

Now, I realize that many (if not most) of you probably have never had to deal with serious data loss. Yeah, maybe some file gets misplaced or eaten every once in a while, but that’s about it. I won’t belabor the multitude of ways in which totally unexpected and really bad stuff can happen to your computer, but you should just spend a minute thinking about what exactly is stored on your hard drive and what the implications would be if you were to come home one day and find that it had just disappeared. Never mind the actual physical computer, that’s replaceable. But think about your music. Your documents. Your email. Your pictures. A lot of that stuff is just not recoverable, and some of it (pictures especially) are priceless. I’m not saying you should be super paranoid all the time, but I am saying that you should recognize what some of the data on your computer is worth, and treat it accordingly. Some suggestions, after the jump.

-Don’t keep things on your computer at all

This is one of the easiest and most reliable ways to keep your data backed up. Take email, for example. If you just use webmail, you’re all set, since no email is stored on your computer. Or, you might have a program like Outlook or Thunderbird that does download email to your computer. You can go into your account settings in these programs and select something like “leave messages on server,” which will put a copy of all incoming messages on your computer without deleting them from your webmail account, giving you a backup archive of your email. This means that messages build up in your webmail, but odds are you have way more webmail space than you’re using anyway, and if you get tight, just go into your webmail and delete a few big messages to clear out some space.

Another way to keep things off of your computer is by using a service like Google Docs to do your work. You can make documents and spreadsheets and stuff, and Google keeps them for you. Another advantage of this is that whatever you’re working on is accessible from your Google account, no matter where you are or what computer you’re using.

-Back stuff up online

The safest place to have things backed up (IMO) is on someone else’s servers, which (if they’re a big company) means that your data is stored on multiple redundant drives in multiple redundant locations. The cheapest and easiest way of backing things up online is by emailing them to yourself, but sometimes this can be an annoyance to keep doing, so there are a multitude of services which will sync things with an online backup server for you. Some are free, some are not, but if you have a good or bad experience with a particular company, let us know in the comments.

When it comes to online backups of your files, media becomes a big problem, because it takes up huuuuge amounts of disk space and bandwidth if you have a lot of it. For pictures, I personally like Flickr Pro. Unlike anybody else I could find, Flickr will store an unlimited number of full resolution JPGs for $25 a year. You have to upload them yourself, but I’ve gotten into the habit of just doing it when I download images from my camera. Even with the 10 megapixel images that I usually take, it’s a pretty fast process. When it comes to video, YouTube is a viable option now that they accept videos in 720p. It’s not a perfect solution, and you have to find some clever ways of downloading the video, but it’s free. The additional benefit of services like YouTube and Flickr is, of course, that your media is now online and much easier to share with other people.

As far as music goes, I don’t have a good solution to suggest, primarily (I imagine) because of DRM issues. Instead of online backup, I’d just recommend some good old fashioned physical backup.

-Back stuff up physically

This is how most people back up their data, and it involves simply copying files onto multiple disks. It’s fast, it’s easy, it’s usually pretty cheap, and your data is right there when you want it. I carry around a little USB flash drive (this one) with really important stuff (like my thesis) in my wallet. It’s also a place where I store files that I’m actively working on. Longer term, I have a big USB hard drive, and every so often I just copy my entire C: drive on there. It takes a while, but I just let it run overnight. What I should have but don’t is an external RAID 1 drive, which is actually two drives that mirror each other. This way, if one of the drives dies, you don’t lose any data, you replace the dead drive, and remirror them.

Of course, the problem with external drives is that even though they’re external, they’re usually sitting right next to your computer. You’re protected against drive failure, but not someone breaking into your apartment and stealing your stuff (or fires, etc.). So if you take the external drive route, it’s a good idea to keep one somewhere else. Take it to work. Give it to a friend. If you only want to do it every six months or whatever, that’s fine, but it could be the difference between losing ALL of your data and just the last six months of your data. Stuff like your music collection and your pictures should be mostly intact, and if you just went on a trip or something and have a couple thousand new pictures, well, time to update your backup drive.

Like I said, all of this stuff may seem paranoid to you. But if you know anyone who has lost important things like pictures, you know that they ended up kicking themselves for not backing things up. Yes, it’s a bit of pain. Yes, it might cost some money. Consider the alternative, however, and think about how much better you’ll feel knowing that no matter what may happen to your computer, all of the stuff you care about, the data, is safe and sound somewhere else.

Oh, and one more thing: having something happen to your hardware sucks as well. If you have homeowner’s insurance or renter’s insurance, you can often separately insure things like laptops against loss or damage, even if you’re the one who does the losing or damaging. It’s called a personal articles policy, and it’s probably much cheaper than you think… For example, Apple won’t insure iPhones at all, but if they did, they’d probably charge the going rate of $5 a month, which I don’t think even covers losing the phone completely. My insurance company happily covers my iPhone against anything I could conceivably do to it for something like $5 a year. It’s a good deal, and definitely worth doing for anything you carry around with you a bunch like laptops and cameras.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Netvouz
  • NewsVine
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • MySpace
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon

Related posts

TI’s OMAP 3 hardware doesn’t manage to do Windows Mobile 6.5 any favors

We were really impressed with Texas Instruments’ OMAP 3-based mobile development platform when we saw it running Android earlier today, and the hardware seems to hold up well to all sorts of video-accelerated magic for a multitude of Linux-based interfaces. Not so much with Windows Mobile 6.5. Granted, this is a very early build of the OS according to Microsoft, and is lacking all sorts optimization mojo that will go into the final product due end-of-year-ish, but at the same time this is basically an interface skin to Windows Mobile 6 that Microsoft has had nearly a year to work on since 6.1, and it’s not exaggerating to say that performance is a complete joke at the moment. TI’s OMAP 3 was clearly struggling to handle basic scrolling of the home screen and app menu, though “smoothness” was slightly improved in scrolling through a gallery of photos. TI has been working with 6.5 for “a few months,” and claims to have added optimizations to interface performance — and interestingly is running this on a capacitive touchscreen device, something that isn’t officially supported as far as we’re aware. They’re also saying that they plan on achieving full smoothness by the time this launches, but there’s really a long way to go, and it’s difficult to understand why this seems to be a last priority for Microsoft at the moment. On the other hand, TI is doing great things with its own 3D-accelerated interface, something which Windows Mobile 6.5 brings support for, so perhaps these will all one day (soon) meet in the middle and give us the sort of interface smoothness and usability we’d expect on a phone built a decade into this century. Check out the painful videos after the break.
Gallery: TI’s OMAP 3 hardware doesn’t manage to do Windows Mobile 6.5 any favors

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Netvouz
  • NewsVine
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • MySpace
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon

Related posts

APSI’s WinCE-based M480 can’t quite reach Archos’ level

We can’t really knock the folks at APSI for trying to make the M480 into a product it’s not, but in all seriousness, this thing is just two curved edges away from KIRFing the Archos 5. That said, there’s no doubt this piece is trying to get all up in Archos’ grille, with an expansive 4.8-inch 800 x 480 touchscreen, 30GB / 60GB of internal storage, a TV output, dual-core 400MHz OMAP2530 processor and a battery good for six to seven hours (with audio) / four to five hours (with video). There’s even support for a multitude of file formats, but the lackluster Windows CE 5.0 operating system essentially murders any chance it had at being successful. Sorry, buddy — better luck next time.

[Via PMPToday]

Related posts

mobiBLU’s A10 UFO player may lift off when playing Jefferson Airplane

Is it a portable media player, or just a media player? Should it be worn around the neck, or simply left on the living room table? These questions and more become yours to answer should you choose to invest in mobiBLU’s A10 UFO. All we’re told is that it’s available in glossy red or glossy black and that it features Bluetooth, support for a multitude of file formats, a built-in battery, headphone jack and 2/4/8GB of internal storage. If you look carefully, you’ll notice that the red version is actually already starting to float upwards upon the strumming of the first chords in “White Rabbit.” Far out, man.

[Via AnythingButiPod]
Source

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Netvouz
  • NewsVine
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • MySpace
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon

Related posts